Stop a Summons - Avoid Court Efficiently (do your homework though) (2023)

Introduction

youarelaw.org - Not legal advice. Be advised due to sheer volume of questions we cannot answer question here. See our Premium Membership areas for communications methods.

Trinsey vs Pagliaro - The fastest way to attack a traffic or other criminal matters; kill jurisdiction issues early. Many cases the summons is only presumed to be valid and is not sworn to under oath. And their attorney will enter totally hearsay statements NOT under oath. The key to winning is finding their defects.

Content

How to stop a summons or the other attorney using Trin's Lee versus pag the arrow now one way to stop hearsay evidence from being submitted by an opposing party's, summons or attorney, is to be aware of the significance of the trends Lee versus pag the arrow case.

It can affect many things and it can probably get you a win if you're paying close attention to what the other guy is doing, believe it or not, they're, not all geniuses, and they do make mistakes, and if you can catch them on the simplest of mistakes, you can win your case, especially if they're coming after you for some sort of criminal matter.

That's really what this is about.

That'd be a ticket or any other form of criminal matter.

So when we look at trizzie versus pag, the aro Trinity versus pegged arrow, it's plain to see that the courts relies solely on the affidavit sworn by the process.

Server.

Who serves the court documents to the summons us to the court now without it that being valid? There is no case there is no jurisdiction established guys if you just focus on how to break the link of jurisdiction throughout your case.

That will be the key to winning now whether they you can stop them from bringing you in personally or whether you can break them down on their procedures.

You need to use all those forms of ammunition to break down the fact that they have no jurisdiction, and then you can motion for dismissal.

Remember the maximum that an unrooted affidavit becomes the judgment in law.

That's the whole trick, they're playing on you.

So if we don't rebut the affidavit of the process, server.

Well, then really having a judgment awarded against us before we even get started.

So the first major step when we get summons, is to respond right away to the summons or subpoena that the process server brought to appear and swear to the truth on his affidavit.

Then, if you weren't served properly, then you can order the case dismissed so definition of a summons is an instrument used to commence a civil action or special proceeding and it's a means of acquiring jurisdiction over a party.

Now, if you only learned one thing in law to focus on how not to let the other party acquire jurisdiction over you, which, by the way, is a voluntary act? Well, then you can learn how to avoid many of the kinds of cases that are brought against you.

It's all a trick to get you to volunteer and walk in same with the subpoena.

It looks like a command to appear at a certain time to give testimony, but upon a certain matter, but again it's got to be valid, so on May 28 1964 John is transy or jr.

versus Frank pug, the arrow and the Alpert Foreman Esquire.

The defendants motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, unsupported by affidavits or depositions, is incomplete because it requests the court to consider facts outside the record, which has not been presented in the form required by the rules: 12 B, 6, +, 56, C and the statement you want to sort of memorize.

If you get anything out of this, video is statements of counsel in their briefs or arguments while enlightening to the court, are not sufficient for purposes of granting a motion to dismiss or summary judgment.

In other words, they can't get a summary judgment against you if their briefs are not sufficient and almost everything you should know that comes into the court.

These days is hearsay, there's typically not even a witness, with an affidavit attached swearing that they were harmed by you and if they weren't the rules of common law prevail.

If you bring it up, if you walk right in and continue like it's the real deal and it abides you and it obligates you to do something.

Well, then, you therefore agreed okay, so you gotta be careful.

This is how you avoid volunteering, and this transy versa pact.

The aro concept is very important to get so.

Let's look at the summons, get the summons.

If the pocket, for example, the the party delivering the summons, will not come in and testify that they could verify.

It was in fact you they delivered it -.

That could be a flaw see if you learn how to identify, as you could win cases and, frankly, in most cases they can't, even by the fact that you know this is why we avoid tease people to avoid giving their name at the door.

Ask questions instead, because until they get the name, they can't deliver it to you.

Even then they can't positively identify you.

So if the case proceeds and that party isn't actually there and swearing under testimony that they delivered proper service, you can win the case.

Just on that one issue alone forget what they went with their attorney says.

Their attorney is going to tell you all kinds of things: they're trained to lie.

You have to see firsthand witness, have them come up and testify to that? They typically do not and that's a big flaw that you can go for.

Additionally, the attorney goes on and starts saying all kinds of things.

Well he did this and he did that and he basically they testify.

If you learn how to object every to almost everything that that attorney is saying your chances of winning are much better.

If you do happen to lose the fact that you put all those objections in based upon those points will be the only points you can bring up in an appeal so later.

If you have to appeal something- and you lose the case, but you got to appeal, though every objection is the key point at which you can bring up in the appeal.

You can't bring up other information or new information.

You can only bring up your objections and how the court ruled against you and shouldn't have that's how you win an appeal, so you're always setting up your appeal as you go through a case by objecting to everything, particularly as it relates to hearsay.

Information like the summons, the summons was hearsay.

The driver's license that they might bring out is hearsay.

There's nobody the way to evidence that that's you, you see how this works, so you don't just buy into everything they present you as being factual.

Everything needs to be sworn to whether it's a mortgage tax bill driver's license whatever they're using, is some form of evidence.

It's hearsay.

You have to object to it.

It's unsupported by affidavits, which means it's incomplete and if it's incomplete it's insufficient for giving a is, basically it can't be used for the purposes of granting a motion to dismiss or a summary judgment.

In fact, your motion to dismiss should be there lacking that affidavit and proper deposition, so the how you protect your rights is to protect them early and often, and it's all about the flaws and their procedures, and this is one of the easiest way to win a case or an appeal later.

As long as you objected to things, so that's just my tip of the day get more information at you.

Our law org.

If you'd like to see this document or other similar documents become a Premium Member at you, our law, org.